Talk:2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota

This article was nominated for deletion on April 12, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Removed Section

The following text was removed, mostly do to it's lacking citations and being poorly written, please do not reinsert it without discussing it here. Spiesr 13:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson is being helped by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) financially, as they are holding fundraisers to make Johnson competitive.   
Originally, this race was seen as a pure toss-up, given that South Dakota is a solid GOP state and his narrow victory over Sen. John Thune, back then a Represenative. However, given the current health situation, it is strongly unlikely that any prominent GOPer will challenge him.   
   
==Democrats==   
*Sen. Tim Johnson - Incumbent; Democratic colleagues are raising money for him   
   
==Republican Candidates==   
*Gov. Mike Rounds - a popular figure in South Dakota, there was a strong inclination that he might run against Johnson; however, due to the sensitive issue of health, he might choose not to run and continue in his position as the Governor of South Dakota.

Added

I added Mike Rounds name to the list so anyone could see he may run. Politics rule 8:55am EST.-4/21/2007.

Deleted

A line about "When Republicans polled they did not include Rounds". There is no evidence supporting this. Plus, the sentence implies that all Republicans acted together in polling, rather than a polling firm (whether partisan or not) on behalf of a client (whether political or not). 207.138.153.98 17:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)revfig[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States Senate election in South Dakota, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]