Talk:2008–09 La Liga

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikinews invitation

Wikinews needs people to write news and match reports for La Liga. To sign-up, please go here. Please let me know if and when you sign-up here. Kingjeff (talk) 14:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bilić's Goals

I notice at official site of La Liga that Mate Bilić only scored 2 goals not 3. Also, in the official reports of matches from RFEF proves that point (First match Sporting 1-2 Getafe and second match Sevilla 4-3 Sporting). So, in Statistics says he scored first Hat-Trick of season but in report of the match (against Sevilla) clarifies that Bilić only scored 2 goals.--KSA¹³ 07:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goal Scoring Chart

When I was trying to edit the chart, I messed up somehow, and noww it says Sinama-Pongolle has 4 goals when he has 5, could someone fix this, because I'm scared I'll mess up again.

4 matches of adventage

In this moment, FC Barcelona has got an adventage of 4 matches (not three) against Real Madrid. This is because FC Barcelona has won the first match against them. PD: Sorry, I know that my English isn't good (I've 14 and I'm studying English). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.45.247 (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bilbao really qualified as losing finalists of Copa del Rey?

(sorry for my bad English) - I thought, if the winner of a national cup already qualifies to the UEFA Europa League or the UEFA Champions League trough the championship, then the qualifying place of the national cup will be given not to its runners-up but to the most ranked team in the championship who, normally, couldn't qualify otherwise. Is this not a new rule? So, if it's the case, Athletic Bilbao are not yet assured to compete in the UEFA Europa League. Could someone claim that? 85.6.11.165 (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the domestic cup winners have qualified for the Champions League via their league place, but the (losing) finalists have not, the latter team will be allowed to the UEL. So Bilbao are already qualified indeed. Would they have to play a team which eventually finishes in "blue territory" after 38 matches, Bilbao would have needed to win it all in order to play in Europe for next year. Hth, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 17:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do also have a look at the current Premier League season talk page, there is a section which contains the respective UEFA link... --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 17:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting de Gijon

Is Sporting de Gijón breaking a record of drawing the least matches in 1 La Liga season? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.109.177 (talk) 06:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008–09 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610192505/http://futbol.sportec.es/ to http://futbol.sportec.es/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]