Talk:2008–09 Celtic F.C. season

Football: Scotland / Celtic / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Celtic F.C. task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Results & Fixtures

Does it really need 2 Match reports for every game? I'm quite happy just to go with the BBC Match report, I only provided Celtic's own reports for Friendlies that the BBC Website didn't cover. However, I would ask what other contributors think about it? Iliketofly (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Results and Fixtures

I agree on this, will I take away the Celtic.net reports?

Players In/Out

Please don't add Players to the transfer lists unless there has been confirmation of a signing from a reputable source (ie not something you heard from a Taxi driver). And don't add Players who are on trial, as they (almost) never actually sign. Iliketofly (talk) 00:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Cervi

Can somebody add him onto the list please,I find all the writing confusing宁雨翔 (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All what writing? While he is training with Celtic now, he hasn't signed yet, due to Work Permit issues. Rest assured, however, that he will be added as soon as his signing is confirmed. Iliketofly (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Zaluska

Should he really be added to the In/Out's section for this Season, as he won't in any case be joining until June 1st, ie next Season? Any thoughts from other contributors? (nb please remember to sign posts on Talk pages with 4 Tildes) Iliketofly (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Player Stats

If you update the goals scored column, please update the other columns, too. They're hardly accurate staistics otherwise, and unless you compare past revisions, it's not nescessarily noticeable that they've been changed, which could lead to extra goals being added. Iliketofly (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008–09 Celtic F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828035704/http://www.celticfc.net:80/news/stories/news_180808122309.aspx to http://www.celticfc.net/news/stories/news_180808122309.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]