Talk:2007 in poetry

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Standard for inclusion

What is the appropriate standard of notability for determining what should be included on this page? Dce7 01:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've found the answer to my own question. From the WP notability guidelines: "... list articles like List of English writers are expected to include only notable writers." Dce7 20:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, you found your own answer because it was the answer that SUITS you. The list of English writers is not a list of writers in the English language. It's a list of writers from England (Britian). Where is your list of American writers to compare against?

By the way, the first paragraph concerning Southward Editions is PURE ADVERTISING. Why don't you get delete-happy about that little ad?

Here's what you should put in the Wikipedia search box when you feel like doing some independent research about "third-rate, no-name" publishers: WordTech Communications (130.74.112.227 20:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I've been reading WOrdtech books for several years now. When did they become "third-rate"? (Wicksolomon 21:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Actually, that is probably the best guideline for inclusion. Non-notable authors should not be included, even if they belong to a notable publisher or organisation. x42bn6 Talk 22:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Bunin Prize

There is an ignorance of fact. There is a jury of the Bunin prize and an expert board (the line-up can change every year). In 2007 viz. the expert board dissolved itself, because of the conflict with the board of guardians (i.e. sponsors). See, for instance, a piece of news (in Russian): http://lenta.ru/news/2007/08/24/bunin/ Stonedhamlet (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]