Talk:2007 World Aquatics Championships

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Melbourne / Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2007 World Aquatics Championships is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Water sports

	2007 World Aquatics Championships is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Multisport or not?

In my opinion aquatics is a name to combine various sports, so this championship qualifies as a multisports event featuring swimming, synchronised swimming, diving and waterpolo. So, what I'm saying, in my opinion the multisport category should be re-added to the category list. SportsAddicted | discuss 00:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Shouldn't this article be named 2007 World Aquatics Championships, since all other FINA World Aquatics Championships follow that naming convention? Or should all the others be changed? - Ektar 20:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Officially, the event is called the "FINA World Championships", so they should probably all be changed to that. "World Aquatics Championships" is a descriptive term, although "Aquatics World Championships" might be better. The presence of both "FINA" and "Aquatics" is somewhat redundant. Hooperswim 04:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Medal Imbalance

Can someone explain to me why FINA discriminates against men by allowing there to be more medal events open to Women at their Aquatic Championships than there are for Men? Why is it that there are 7 more events at which Women can win medals as compared to the Men? Why is there such blatant discrimination allowed by FINA? I thought the introduction of Women's Water Polo was called for as a result of trying to end discrimination against Women, if that is the case - why are there still 7 events that can be contested only by Women? 155.143.221.252 05:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to watch Synchronised Swimming with men!? Pedroq 09:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is the point - the point is, if there is a Sport at this World Championships reserved solely for Women - then by rights there should be a sport reserved solely for Men. Otherwise, its simply a blatant case of sexism. Can you think of 7 Medal sports that could be introduced for men to redress this sexism? As for watching male synchro swimming, I don't think that's ever going to fly - hopefully not. jkm 11:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! If that's the only reason it gets watched, it's not a sport. *cough*porn*cough* --Monotonehell 15:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even with the women's-only sport of Synchro, men still outnumbered women at the entire FINA 2007 Worlds. The reason those 7 events exist, at least at the Olympic level, is to help bring about completely number equity at the Olympics (similar to what happens with USA colleges within the NCAA). FINA includes Olympic events at their Worlds, so consequently they are there (and incidentally, FINA's gender numbers are based off the whole Championships, and not really on a discipline-by-discipline basis for the gender comparison). Regarding men and Synchro, there have been some petitions to allow men to compete at the Olympics and Worlds in the discipline, however, these have been denied by the FINA/IOC who are "protecting" it somewhat (the USA had a male member to its 2000 Olympic Training team, who traveled to Australia and Sydney for the Games--he qualified for the USA Olympic team, but was not allowed to actually be entered on the team roster as an athlete for the Olympics).Hooperswim 04:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2007 World Aquatics Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]