Talk:2007 Terengganu riot
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of 2007 Terengganu riot be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Did you know
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by SL93 (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Unresolved issues, nominator not responding.
2007 Terengganu Riot
( )
- ... that police shot two men during a peaceful rally-turned-riot in Terengganu, Malaysia? Source: "At 11.45pm, a general duty police constable allegedly shoots PAS members Suwandi Abdul Ghani (left), 37, and Muhamad Azman Aziz, 21, near Permai Inn Hotel. In all, four shots are fired. Police later say the constable was acting in self-defence after being surrounded and assaulted by 20 people." ([1])
- Reviewed: Satyawati Suleiman
Created by Bejinhan (talk). Self-nominated at 00:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC).
I have some concerns about the article that need to be addressed as soon as possible. Firstly, the article states that there was a plan to hold some kind of inquiry on the incident, as discussed in the "Aftermath" section. However, the section doesn't seem to have any updates on what happened to that inquiry, or what were its findings. Secondly, while the hook is technically acceptable, it sounds like a news report rather than a hook and doesn't give much context about the event (it doesn't even mention the year, which could make people assume that it happened this year!). These need to be resolved before this can be approved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The nominator has not edited in almost a month, and has mostly been inactive since June 10th (save for an edit on June 24th). If they will be unable to reply by Thursday, the nomination may be marked for closure. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The nominator has been unable to return to the nomination in spite of pings and talk page messages. Marking for closure as stale. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
