Talk:2007 New York Mets season

Baseball: Mets Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Mets (assessed as High-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mergefrom 2007 New York Mets collapse

The prod tag has been removed from 2007 New York Mets collapse so I'll start a discussion about merging it here. It has some good information but there's simply no reason for it be a separate article from this one, esp. not when this one could use some expansion. Enough info could be added here to get it to WP:FA level. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, The 2007 New York mets collapse was needed as a seperate article, especially sicne when you merged it with this one you added no new information, so you did not really merge, but deleted it. I would put a seperate section on to this article devoted to the mets collapse.

Second, this article does not need expansion as it is alredy way too long for the little amount of information it has.

And third, this artilce will never reach FA status. It is terrible by my standards, and needs masive cleanup so don't even count on it ever reaching FA status.

I would wait for more responses on this subject, and see what other people say, but i think most people will agree and want to make it it's own article again. Juliancolton 00:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Current Roster"

Anyone have any ideas how we should do this? Perhaps simply rename the section "Roster" and include only people who can be considered to have played a "full season," however the MLB designates that. JHMM13^(Disc) 23:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 New York Mets season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214205908/http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2662193 to http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2662193

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]