Talk:2007 Miami Dolphins season

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Miami

	This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Departures, arrivals, etc.

Two things. First of all, is there really any need to list every single player move? And secondly, if so, is it really necessary to have so many references for all of these moves? Surely, there are a few websites at the least that could have all this information without having to get 40+ separate references. Ksy92003(talk) 22:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I definitely think having all the moves is a good thing. I suppose PFW links could be used to lower the number of referenced, but overall I think it's set up fine.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any issue with the actual listing of the players, but the number of references by far exceeds the total that I would think would be necessary, especially if there is one site that does it all. By the way, what are PFW links? Ksy92003(talk) 22:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I meant links to Pro Football Weekly like this one.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know what "PFW" meant. Do you think that there is some way that we could use the Pro Football Weekly websites in this situation? That would definitely reduce the number of references by about 85%. Ksy92003(talk) 23:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could do that, but I really don't have the energy at the moment.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 23:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe it's okay; it's 8:00 over there. Heck, I don't feel like doing it either, and it's only 5:00 here. Ksy92003(talk) 23:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:AFCE-Uniform-MIA.PNG

The image File:AFCE-Uniform-MIA.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]