Talk:2007 Giro d'Italia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll review this article. Comments will follow shortly. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. A very clear and straight pass on the GA criteria. I haven't found any area that doesn't meet the GA criteria, so I'm not going to ask for improvements for the sake of it.

Verifiability, comprehensiveness, image use and neutrality are all excellent. In particular, you've taken great care to properly source the doping content which contains quite negative material about living persons.

The prose is good enough for GA standard, but I think it could do with another set of eyes if you're planning to send it to FA. It can get a bit unwieldy at times, especially in the "Minor classifications" section. It passes the GA criteria of "clear" prose with correct spelling and grammar, but the FA standard of "engaging" and "professional" is a little higher.

Top stuff. I enjoyed the read. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do plan to head toward FA eventually, but PR will come first. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 02:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]