Talk:2007 Amsterdam Admirals season

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Staff complete

There, I've added pages for all listed 2007 coaches and 2006 is just missing one now --Numbers47 19:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, I just completed Jaret Johnson and will start working on Noriaki Kinoshita now, the research that goes into these articles is crazy... I think I spend nearly 8 hours on Jaret alone, but then again I got something all other bio's and background stories on him missed... :) --Z Doc 22:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roster Table

How do you guys feel about changing the roster table to:

No	Player	Pos	College	Aquired
7	Bramlet, Corey	QB	Wyoming	FA-2007
8	Olsen, Drew	QB	UCLA	NFLDraft-1/Ravens
9	Pakulak, Glenn	P	Kentucky	NFL/Titans

For clarity and removing redundancy since that info is readily available on the player his corresponding page (see: Corey Bramlet.

Cheers, Z Doc 23:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm

I don't know. It looks pretty clear to me the way it is. (Also took a lot of time to add it ;)) Plus not all players have their own page or the info is not listed on it. Still, other people's thoughts? --Numbers47 07:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you spend a lot of time completing the table, that's why I asked before acting... :) I'm working hard on giving each and every player their own page, it's a lot of research however (I only managed to do one profile last night for instance). I wouldnot want to change the roster layout untill we have all player pages up. The idea behind it is that we can make the roster table more condensed and have offense on the left and defense on the right, with PS, IR and special teams below. Z Doc 08:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Well, once we get to that stage I think it may be worth considering yes. O# en D# separately would probably look more organized. --Numbers47 08:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]