Talk:2007 AT&T 250/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Will be taking on this review and expect comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Background

• "It returned to the schedule in 1993 and had been on the schedule every year" - reptition of schedule
• "Wimmer, who entered the race with three consecutive top-five finishes and five consecutive top-tens," - same issue as above
• "David Reutimann, Regan Smith, Greg Biffle, Marcos Ambrose, Bobby Hamilton Jr., and Jason Leffler rounded out the top ten." - you're missing David Ragan from this sentence.

Practice and qualifying

• It would be helpful to the general reader to have the knowledge what the fastest lap times set by Scott Wimmer were

Race

• The 250-lap race began at 8:00 p.m. EDT, televised live on ESPN2." - The 250-lap race began at 8:00 p.m. EDT, and was televised live in the United States on ESPN2.
• These two sources [1] [2] would help to clarify some major points in this sub-section like why Hamlin could not land in the infield and which of Edwards' tire went flat and how that came to be

Post-race comments

• Wikilink ESPN and do the same in the lead

References

• Refs 7 and 20 lead to a 404 page and will need archiving.

Overall quite the well-written article we have here. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 08:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

@MWright96: Done all. Let me know if there is anything else or if you have an article you would like me to review. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

@Bcschneider53: There's nothing else that needs rectifying so I can now pass this review. MWright96 (talk) 21:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)