Jump to content

Talk:2006 World Cup of Pool

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2006 World Cup of Pool/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 17:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Infobox

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Format

[edit]

Prize fund

[edit]
  • "Prize money for the event featured $250,000 with $60,000 being awarded to the winning team." - A total of $250,000 was made available for the prize pool, with $60,000 being awarded to the winning team.

Teams

[edit]
  • Consider adding information about which teams were seeded for the tournament in this section

Early rounds (first–second round)

[edit]

Later rounds (quarter-finals–final)

[edit]

Tournament bracket

[edit]
  • I believe Reference 5 can also be used in this section to verify both the format and the seeds

References

[edit]

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the above changes MWright96. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lee Vilenski: Can still see the lack of information on the semi-final match between the Phillipines and Germany and the inappropriate use of Sport, Matchroom and Release, Press being written into the last= and first= fields of several references. MWright96 (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • So, every other article about the first semifinal is now dead (with no archive). Not really sure what I can do. I've added the score to the section (and fixed the ref issues), but without a suitable ref, I can't expand the first semi-final.
  • Ah, IPM to the rescue, should be fixed now. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lee Vilenski: Now promoting to GA class. I've added some missing details to some of the references and had to remove one that had a archive url that was linked to something else although the IPM source did verify all the information in the first-semi-final match. MWright96 (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]