This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
I oppose the suggestion that Pete Ricketts' article be merged into this one. Nearly all major party nominees for the Senate this year have their own pages. In fact, these pages are often linked to from outside Wikipedia on political websites tracking the candidates. For instance, see The 2006 Senate Races. Furthermore, Pete Ricketts has spend about $10 million becoming visible in Nebraska. Anyone with a television in Nebraska will be able to verify that you can't see a commercial break without seeing a Ricketts ad. I believe he meets the notibility requirements on WP:C&E. Alienmercy16:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alienmercy, Pete Rickets prima facie does not meet WP:C&E, because the article has no reliable sources. The official campaign site doesn't count as a source, but if you would like to add some reliable cited material, then I'd be OK with letting the page stay where it is. Cheers, Vectro17:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]