Jump to content

Talk:2006 Pennsylvania General Assembly bonus controversy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"All four caucuses"?

[edit]

The link to ref #3 is dead, so I'm curious about what is meant by "all four cacusus"? I'm an ignorant Canadian, but I was pretty sure you guys were pretty bipartisan down there - do the Greens and Libertarians have representation, or something? Anyway, the article right now seems pretty exclusively focussed on Democratic wrongdoing (as do the sources), so I'm wondering if some more details are available about the behaviour of the other three (?) caucuses. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - that would be a House and Senate caucus for each of the two parties, right? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly right. I think one of the things that the Democrats have complained about is that they have been stepped on a bit by the GOP attorney general. The Dem leader is also the one who sacked a bunch of staffers over their emails. It does need to be beefed up a lot. I can try and add some info tonite, but will be out of town for a few days so I won't be spending too much time on it.Montco (talk) 03:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you can direct me to some useful sources, I can do some work on it; but, as you can tell from my above question, the sources would need to be pretty thorough, since I'm lacking some context. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have worked on it a bit. I can pass along some other bits as well

Dont know how much all this will help, but this is still very much in a developing stage. Normally grand jury proceedings are secret, so much of this information is based on documents leaked to the media.

Montco (talk) 04:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Pennsylvania General Assembly bonus controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2006 Pennsylvania General Assembly bonus controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_Pennsylvania_General_Assembly_bonus_controversy&oldid=1201137401"