Talk:2006 Nova Scotia general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Nova Scotia / Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Untitled

I would put the popular vote %ages up myself, but the regions used in wikipedia differ from those used at the CBC. the CBC's regions are the same used in 2003, and so you could put the change, but editing the ridings to fit within the proper regions is not easy... I dont know why these regions were used. frankly, its too much work to switch everything and calculate everything. perhaps one day when I'm bored, maybe, but otherwise I dont think I can do it. Pellaken 20:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The regions I used for this page are based on a tourist map I found on the internet. The CBC regions are arbitrary. I will calculate the results on my own time, like I have for the last two provincial elections in Canada. --

Earl Andrew - talk 04:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still dont understand why arbitrary tourist map areas, are less arbitrary then arbitrary CBC election regions. sounds like an arbitrary decision to arbitrarily decide on who's arbitrary regions are less arbitrary. 70.30.214.26 09:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Links

Can I suggest that links are not made on names that do not already have an article in place.

I just removed links to two GPNS candidates that were pointing to pages for people who are almost certainly not the right person.

My guess is that the whole page needs to be audited. All the live links need to be verified that they point to the actual candidate, and deleted if they are wrong. All the red links need to be deleted. If not there exists the danger that an article will be written for another person of the same name. Derek Andrews (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nova Scotia general election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060615051248/http://www.cbc.ca:80/ns/story/nsv-elxn-night20060613.html to http://www.cbc.ca/ns/story/nsv-elxn-night20060613.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]