Talk:2006 New York gubernatorial election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Governors Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

Request for "other" candidates?

Commented out the following block.

 ===Other===
 *[[INSERT NAME OF CANDIDATES HERE]]

I take it this is a request for "other" candidates? Velvetsmog 08:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV issue--focus on Dems in introduction

I'm new to this topic, so I'm not going to rearrange the article, but it seems to violate the NPOV policy by dwelling on the Democratic Party candidate in the introduction. Shouldn't he be discussed in the section on the Democratic party? Or perhaps he's the overall favorite for this race, not just for the Democratic nomination (as suggested in the intro). AdamRetchless 22:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spitzer is polling at least 66% in every non-Zogby poll. Blah42 22:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Independance"

I noticed the same party was called both "Independence" and "Independance". Was this a typographical error or is the party named spelled differently than the word?

Paul D. Omilian

The entry for Paul D. Omilian seems a bit POV. If so, can someone else attend to that (as I have no interest in or understanding of this election)? --A bit iffy 05:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and NOR issues, entire article

I have added {{POV-check}} for multiple phrasings that express opinions without sources. Some examples (by no means comprehensive) of what I believe to be either introduced arguments (in violation of WP:NOR) or opinions without sources (in violation of WP:NPOV) are:

" ... Eliot Spitzer, a popular politician in the state" — opinion; whose opinion is it?
"Spitzer is currently the overwhelming favorite" — opinion; whose opinion is it?
"early announcement and buzz about Spitzer's candidacy is believed to have dissuaded" — who believes this, without sourcing it is original research
"Despite long shot status, many see Suozzi as electable and able to reform Albany"

There are many more questionable phrases throughout the article and I believe a review is necessary. — SkydiveMike 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the phrase "Obama of 2006." Minimal and dubious ghits [1] suggest that this is a phrase used only by a tiny fringe, and is unverifiable (3 bloggers != "some political anylists." -Seidenstud 13:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suozzi

Spitzer beat Suozzi in the primary, but Suozzi info. should remain for historical purposes, right?—Markles 14:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to put most of this back in

Eliot Spitzer is the Democratic candidates for the gubernatorial race of New York State. As New York State Attorney General, Spitzer made a name for himself nationally having won convictions, plea deals, and settlements against large corporations that had evaded federal regulators. He formally announced his candidacy for the New York Democratic nomination shortly after the end of the 2004 elections on December 7, 2004.

The early announcement and buzz about Spitzer's candidacy is believed to have dissuaded two rumored Democratic contenders, Andrew Cuomo and Chuck Schumer, from contesting him; instead, Andrew Cuomo is now running for the attorney general seat that Spitzer will vacate in 2006 and Schumer will remain in the U.S. Senate. Taking advantage of New York state's electoral fusion system, that allows for a candidate to run on multiple party's ballot lines, Spitzer gained the early nomination of the left-leaning Working Families Party in January 22, 2005. The deal effectively consolidates Eliot Spitzer's frontrunner status, while cementing the WFP's reputation as a kingmaker third-party in New York.

The main source of Spitzer's electoral appeal has been high profile prosecutions of corporate executives in cases of fraud and labor abuses, taking advantage of the unique powers of the New York Attorney General's office. This has gained him the praise and endorsements of several labor unions active in the state, including SEIU, UNITE HERE, and the Teamsters. Simultaneously, it has gained criticism from those sympathetic to the interests of business, including the influential Editorial section of The Wall Street Journal. Complicating matters further, some note Spitzer's own personal contradictions‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}: while Andy Stern of SEIU has called Spitzer a "class hero", Spitzer himself comes from an affluent background. It has led some to suggest that Spitzer pursued cases as Attorney General for ulterior motives, or just mere vanity.‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}

An uncertainty in the early part of the race was the status of Governor George Pataki. While Eliot Spitzer's gubernatorial ambitions were well known for some time before a public announcement, Pataki remained silent about a run for re-election while rumors of his presidential bid were made. After early polling for the gubernatorial election suggested Pataki would lose in a gubernatorial matchup against Spitzer as well as trips to Iowa and New Hampshire - home to the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary and a first stop in a 2008 presidential run) - Pataki announced he would not seek the 2006 gubernatorial nomination and would not seek another term.

Maybe this too

The perceived indecision of Pataki on the issue of a fourth run for governor put Republican leaders and insiders into a bind, of not wanting to embarrass Pataki or state Republican leadership by appearing to break ranks, but still facing the prospect of the Spitzer campaign amassing a considerable strength and war chest in the early running. Consequently, the GOP has appeared divided, with rumors of several Republicans either seeking or being approached about running.

The first announced Republican candidate was Randy Daniels, the Secretary of State appointed by Governor Pataki in 2001. His political supporters include New York Conservative Party Chairman Michael Long. His association with the Conservative Party (who split their ticket with the Republicans in the 2004 senatorial election), as well as his past association with the Democratic administration of New York City mayor David Dinkins, however, has caused his Republican bona fides to be considered questionable by many in the party, most notably state GOP Chairman Stephen J. Minarik III. [2]

No Republican has won statewide office in New York without Conservative Party backing since the late Senator Jacob Javits in 1974.

Considered a possibility since her decision not to seek re-election for District Attorney of Westchester County in 2005, Jeanine Pirro was rumored for a run at governor, but she chose to run for U.S. Senator - against Hillary Clinton - instead, then withdrew - after several televised blunders, and the loss of the backing of the Republican party- to run for attorney general.

On August 19, 2005, former Massachusetts Governor William Weld made official his bid for the Republican line. If elected, Weld would become only the second person in history to serve as Governor of two different states, after Sam Houston.

However, Weld has been dogged by a scandal involving his tenure as CEO of Decker College, a trade school in Kentucky. After Weld resigned as CEO in October, 2005, Decker College filed for bankruptcy and was charged with several counts of federal fraud. While Weld told reporters that he had been told he was not a target of the probe, Marisa Ford, chief of the criminal division for the US Attorney’s office in Louisville, disputed that claim, saying, “Nobody in this office advised Mr. Weld’s attorney that he is not a target.” [3].

Weld has also been beset by claims that he has flip-flopped on gay marriage in an attempt to win the Conservative Party endorsement. Weld told the Conservative Party in February, 2006, that he would veto any bill to legalize gay marriage, leading Conservative Party chair Michael Long to say, "He has evidently - clearly - moved on the issue" [4]. Previously, Weld had called a court decision to legalize gay marriage "a thunderbolt correctly heard," had performed the homily at his chief-of-staff's gay wedding, and had written a letter to 200 legislators urging them to legalize gay marriage.

In response to the perceived turnaround, gay activist Arline Isaacson says, Weld “never, ever, ever limited that support [of gay marriage] in any of his remarks to Massachusetts. He's been so good on this, on our right to same-sex marriage, that I want to make sure he's not being misunderstood, because he has been fabulously supportive of us, and there was never any equivocation in the last few years about how he views same-sex marriage".

Early in the race, a prominent figure was billionaire Tom Golisano, who ran three consecutive campaigns as an Independence Party candidate. The New York Times reports that many New York State Republican Party insiders are considering nominating Golisano. The perceived advantages would be unifying both the Independence and Republican Party lines, and that Golisano could devote his personal wealth toward an entirely self-financed campaign, freeing state and federal party resources for other campaigns. Perceived disadvantages include the bitter recriminations between Golisano and Pataki from three consecutive campaigns: Pataki's supporters long viewed Golisano as a spoiler candidate, while Golisano's supporters accused Pataki of attempting to "steal" the Independence Party's nomination in the 2002 campaign. On October 7, 2005, Republican sources reported to the New York Sun Golisano plans to switch to the Republican line for governor [5]. On January 31, 2006, Golisano announed he would not run for governor, citing "personal and professional reasons". [6]

A December 31, 2005 Associated Press story hinted that another prominent billionaire, developer Donald Trump, might be considering a run for governor. State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno had told reporters Thursday, December 29, 2005 that a "big-name" candidate was considering a run for governor as a Republican. The following day, he confirmed to an Albany, New York news channel he was referring to Trump. [7] But on January 3, 2006 Trump told the New York Post [8] that, while he was "honored" to have had his name floated for the job, he wasn't interested. Instead, he held out the possibility of endorsing Spitzer, whom he said has done "an amazing job" as attorney general.

On January 23, 2006, Spitzer selected State Senator David A. Paterson of Harlem as his running mate. [9] On February 14, John Faso launched a state-wide campaign ad announcing his candidacy for governor. On February 25, Tom Suozzi officially announced his candidacy for governor. [10] On March 3, Pat Manning announed he would not run for governor. [11] On March 13, both Eliot Spitzer and Tom Suozzi launched their first campaign ads. On April 10, Randy Daniels announced he was dropping out of the race.

On May 30, 2006, Spitzer and Paterson won the endoresement of the New York State Democratic party. [12] He still, however, must face Suozzi in the Democratic primary.

The late Spring nominations of John Faso by the Conservative Party and Weld by the Libertarian Party could be significant. As the Washington Post put it, "[n]ow it turns out whoever loses the GOP primary will stay in the race -- in a position likely to siphon votes from the Republican nominee." [13]

On June 5, Stephen J. Minarik, the chairman of the state Republican Party, and who had been Weld's most prominent backer, called on Weld to withdraw from the race in the interest of party unity. [14]

On June 6, Weld announced that he was dropping out of the governor's race and endorsing Faso. This followed reports that he was considering staying in the race and using his own money to fund his campaign.

On July 25, Eliot Spitzer and Tom Suozzi debated at Pace University in New York City. A poll from August 8 show a perceived victory in the debate by Eliot Spitzer. [http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/ny-lisien084844347aug08,0,4062239.story ?coll=ny-lipolitics-headlines]

Ill work on the links next

and hopefully we will be able to remove the npov tag soon. I think the republican candidates section should be expanded. Is anyone able to do that?

The Rent is too DAMNED High!!!! party

A fringe candidate had the name of his party censored by the state board of elections. I put this in the article.

Maura DeLuca

"Maura DeLuca is the candidate of the Trotskyist SWP, which generally gets on the ballot every two years and gets a few hundred votes. No one expects anything different this year."

What!? This sentence is completely inappropriate, especially since the results below show that she got over 7,000 votes! -Banyan 22:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

This is not John Faso, it's a photo of the former Governor of New York, George Pataki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.61.164 (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New York gubernatorial election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]