Talk:2006 Lebanon War/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is not neutral; it shows that one side is better than the other, and it has many wrong statistical figures; this shows inaccuracy. Though the article mentions a bunch of references, it has misinterpreted and misused information from the mentioned references and it is unverifiable due to the misinterpretation of the events. Lsvc (talk) 20:40, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well..... What else is new? It broke in the usual UN manner:

"Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch found cases where Hezbollah did fire rockets from, and store weapons in, populated areas and deploy its forces among the civilian population; however, both say that is not conclusive evidence of the intent to use civilians as human shields.[163][168][169]."

It's nuts: To provide the world opinion-makers with their open and truthful bona fides, they admit they "...found cases where Hezbollah did fire rockets from, and store weapons in, populated areas and deploy its forces among the civilian population..." and then add the caveat "..both say that is not conclusive evidence of the intent to use civilians as human shields. "They" do? I'm shocked!! Simply Shocked!!

REALLY!! It's not, huh? Well, what is it "proof" of, then?

Look, Lsvc, even the Israelis are ignoring this. I'll be happy to help out if you can scare up any others who care. Contact me at my talk page.

Good luck! (Paleocon444 (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

As the editor who opened this reassessment hasn't comment and the editor who commented above has only this edit in their history, I am closing this as keep. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]