Talk:2006 European Athletics Championships

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Just a reminder for those monitoring this page. Your opinion on the above move would be appreciated. David D. (Talk) 20:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The organisers of the event call it the European Athletics Championships, so do the media in English speaking countries: why the strange word order in the WP title for the article? Kevin McE 13:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relays

Not sure if this is the best play to ask this, but wouldn't it be a good idea to include the name sof the members of the relay teams who get medals? Currently I don't think this is included in any results pages, but would be a good thing to start to include. Most teams will only have 4 names to add. It just seems a bit odd, empty and incomplete not to have the names there. Evil Eye 15:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say we should absolutely, obviously, include the participants on each team. Take a look at how it's done in Olympic medalists in biathlon, for example. With the participants listed, the reader is informed of the varying composition of the national teams, revealing e.g. those athletes who never got individual medals, but took part in one or more successful relay teams. --Wernher 02:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UK vs GBR&NI

I notice the the article is undecided on whether to list the Union Jack team(s) under the text "United Kingdom" or "Great Britain and Northern Ireland". We should correct this, I think. --Wernher 02:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The official site (see for instance [1]) uses Great Britain & NI, so we should probably stick with that. Punkmorten 22:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Göteborg 2006 logo.svg

Image:Göteborg 2006 logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 European Athletics Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071210202732/http://www.goteborg.com/default.aspx?id=5576 to http://www.goteborg.com/default.aspx?id=5576

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]