Talk:2006 Bank of America 500/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No infobox image?

   "After he was wrecked by his teammate Brian Vickers in the UAW-Ford 500" - in what context? Did he ram into him or is 'wrecked' metaphorical for beating him?

   "Tony Raines elected to not to make a pit stop" - how about decided not to

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Once again, excellent work. This definitely meets the criteria, so I'll pass this outright. I made a few suggestions you can apply if you want to. JAGUAR  14:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I have applied the suggestions to the prose but not the infobox image. Z105space (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

A image of the tracks layout has been added into the infobox. Z105space (talk) 08:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)