Talk:2006 Arizona elections

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

New Article & Possibilities

Yeah, so, I thought this could be a guideline to eventually making articles for each US state's public offices that are decided by all the voters in a state, but excluding federal elections. I don't expect each office to have its own election article, since most of them hardly get the notice that Governor's races and other high-profile races tend to garner. Suggestions, comments, etc, would be cool, especially if anyone could do something to inform the other politics/elections-minded Wikipedians about this stuff. Thanks. --JMurphy 17:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supposed Write-In Candidate for SMI removed

I reverted edits made by 68.3.20.55 for two reasons. First, the supposed candidate is not registered with the Secretary of State's office, and is therefor not even a write-in candidate, and second, it would seem unlikely that a senior in high school would fill the requirements that all candidates for state mine inspector must have three years experience underground, let alone any age requirements on the office, probably being 25 years. --JMurphy 04:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sounds like a hoax, or someone trying to get people to write him in by adding himself to the article. --Aguerriero (talk) 05:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no objections to move —Mets501 (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Arizona statewide elections, 2006 → Arizona state elections, 2006—Trying out new naming convention JMurphy 18:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Support It would set up a naming system for all other US states. --JMurphy 19:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

This has come out of a discussion in Candidates and elections, about how using terms like "statewide" or "executive" in the names of articles would leave out certain offices that handle state functions, but either function as boards or commissions or are elected from districts. --JMurphy 19:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Initiatives

What about the propositions? AnonMoos 00:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Want to start a new article? Maybe, Arizona ballot decisions, 2006, since not all of them were props. --JMurphy 03:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]