Jump to content

Talk:2006–07 Toronto Raptors season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2006–07 Toronto Raptors season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that during the Toronto Raptors 2006-07 season (team pictured), the National Basketball Association team won their first division title in franchise history?
Current status: Good article

Precedents

[edit]

If you're looking for precedents for single-season articles, just see 2006-07 Phoenix Suns season. Many things happen in a single season for any given NBA team which can be profiled as encylopedic. We even have separate articles for every year's playoffs, NBA Finals and season recap. Chensiyuan 04:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also the NFL has single season articles and before you say anything about popularity the NBA is much more popular around the world (e.g. China, Australia, Europe) than the NFL, this isn't the American Wikipedia. Quadzilla99 14:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilinks for some of the NFL e.g.s: 2006 Tennessee Titans season, 2006 Dallas Cowboys season, 2006 Seattle Seahawks season, to name but a few. Ditto NHL e.g.s: 2006-07 Anaheim Ducks season, 2006-07 Carolina Hurricanes season, 2006-07 Detroit Red Wings season, to name but a few again; and also MLB, e.g. 2007 New York Mets season, 2007 Houston Astros season. Chensiyuan 16:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In any event... Chensiyuan 06:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

Taken right out of the GA criteria --

A good article has the following attributes:

1. It is well written. In this respect:

   (a) the prose is clear and the grammar is correct; and
   (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
As far as I can tell this is a pass. Manual of style is complied with very well. Clarity is there.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:

   (a) provides references to sources used;
   (b) cites reliable sources for quotations and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, preferably using inline citations for longer articles; and
   (c) contains no original research.
Every relevant detail is clearly sourced and clearly formatted. Original research does not appear.

3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:

   (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic; and
   (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
The coverage is as the article's title suggests. Enough detail and compelling narrative.

4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

While there is some trace of a pro-Raps slant it is of a really minute quantity.

5. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.

No issue.

6. Any images it contains are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly.

Images are legitimate, varied, and plentiful. Manderiko 19:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:2006–07 Toronto Raptors season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed through Good article sweeps process. I believe the quality of the article to be in good shape and remains to be an GA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006–07 Toronto Raptors season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006–07 Toronto Raptors season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006–07 Toronto Raptors season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]