This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Question: How were the skiers from 18 down selected? Is it past Four Hills winners + former or current world record holders? Think it might be worth noting in the article, because otherwise people might think it's some bias involved. (FWIW, I think past world champions - i.e. Benkovic, Okabe - should be included too). Sam Vimes | Address me01:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just selected a few big names. Maybe it's better to have the top 30 as these are split off after the first jump. That would make it reasonable. I was doubting about which jumpers to include as well, and came up with this, but I agree with you that making a selection like this might give some troubles. So my idea would be the top 30, but that would also mean that if one of the top 10 jumpers has a bad day after too much alcohol on Jan 1st he won't be mentioned if he finishes in 40th position. Well, he will be mentioned, but in the review of course. Your idea is another solution, and if we are going to use that, we should indeed include a note to explain that. SportsAddicted | discuss06:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
