Talk:2005 Ethiopian general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Ethiopia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

22 killed

The article says 22 people were shot. But IIRC, at least 22 people were said to be killed in the violence, with presumably many more shot. --Open4D 23:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Early opposition gains

Can someone supply an eternal source for this claim: "By the afternoon of the 16th of May, the opposition was halfway towards winning a majority in the national parliament with only about a third of the constituencies reporting complete results."

I think it should also be mentioned that from the start the opposition had been expected to do much better in the cities than in the countryside, and that early results were largely from urban areas. No opposition supporters I spoke with at the time expected their early lead to persist once the rural results came in.

I am not a pro-government hack and welcome honest attempts from all sides to clarify the facts. But up to now I've found most online coverage outside Ethiopia a) biased in favor of the CUD and b) poorly supported by impartial sources. This is important disputed history and what's most needed is evidence. -Jacob Eliosoff 19:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a) there's a great deal of suspicion that the 2005 elections were stolen by the EPRDF and b) this is reflected in the sources that we have access to in writing this article. If you could point contributors to less biased sources, I for one would make use of them in improving this & related articles. -- llywrch 03:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Election results sources

Not clear how to document this, but the final election tallies are based on counting membership & representation of the 2005 Ethiopian Parliament; also, before I changed the table, I found that the numbers listed there added up to far more than 527. This information is available at http://www.ethiopar.net/English/hopre/horstrct.htm. -- llywrch 03:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethiopian general election, 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050515155201/http://www.angus-reid.com/tracker/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID=5329 to http://www.angus-reid.com/tracker/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID=5329

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]