Jump to content

Talk:2005 Afro-Asia Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PoV

[edit]

A large amount of the content in this article was PoV/unsourced and potentially libellous; I've removed all of it. If someone wants to rewrite it - with a source - feel free.

From the lead:

However, the political aim seems to be attempts by the Asian nations within the International Cricket Council (ICC) to diminish the influence of the white nations.

From the African XI squad section:

Had the teams been chosen on merit, the team would have been the entire South African team, perhaps with the addition of Heath Streak, but the selectors were forced to pick some weaker players so that all three nations were represented.
It was suggested that the selectors chose some coloured South African cricketers in preference to white players.

From the Asian XI squad section:

... even though arguably no Bangladeshi players would make the side on merit.

From the match reports:

In some ways, a no-result and a drawn series was a fitting finish to what had been an anticlimactic tournament.

Thanks. AllynJ 00:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2005 Afro-Asia Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]