Jump to content

Talk:2005–2006 Thai political crisis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ms. Patiwat, the main contributor of this article You are not so different from me, only...

[edit]

Ms. Patiwat, seems like you are no different from me, you seems to focus on your agenda only as well and ignore other things that you are not believe. The big difference between you and me is; I am writing about anti-thaksin campaign which focusing on Timeline and details. However, in your case, you wrote about the "whole" situation. If that is the case, why you decide to omit the truth regarding PAD, why you only select to write about negative impact of them to the society, on the other hand, you try to push for deletion of my article which is another side of the story; Thaksin Get Out, Lookkeh Long Tang (even on that day they had rally, the traffic was so smooth, I was there). Do you think I am bias? You better start looking at yourself as well before criticizing other people.

I truely believe that you do not love Thaksin, you "warship" him.

I am not going to do the same thing you did to my article. I am not going to push for deletion. I think you know what you are doing.

Again, forgive my english because I am not a "Native" Bilingual like you and never travel + work so extensively like you. Forgive my less intelligence.

Insted of pusihg my article for deletion, why don't you try to write it.

I do not think it is fair to "merge" my article into yours so you cand "edit" and "delete" what you want. To me it is like stealing the effort. You seems like a super smart person, wanna write something, please do it yourself.

Thai_history_0102 / September 9, 2006 (Pacific Time)

I must concur. While Patiwat does have a positive contribution to make, it is clouded by a very bias viewpoint. Patiwat, please take note that many objections have been made to you on Wikipedia. Perhaps it is better for everyone if you accept your strong views may make you unacceptable as an editor and just leave the Thailand politics articles to others. You are not a neutral source and your view does not reflect a full viewpoint or balanced reporting of facts. Greg hill 08:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

$1.88 billion Shin Corporation transaction section

[edit]

In this section, it claims "he" sold his shares in Shin Corporation. Who is "he?" I'm assuming Thaksin, but it's not clear. Also, who are Damapong and Potjaman? They are referenced as if mentioned earlier in the article, but there is nothing about them anywhere else. --Atkinson 17:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potjamon is his wife 203.147.0.48 14:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:April12 new.jpg

[edit]

Image:April12 new.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nation03302006.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nation03302006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:RoyalPAD.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone make sense of the following description?

[edit]
I find it totally confusing and I think it should be either removed or explained.

In a statement, the military Democratic Reform Council cited the government's alleged lèse majesté, interference with state agencies, and creation of social divisions as reasons for the coup.[126] The allegations, however, failed to be pursued seriously, except for charges of corruption in which Thaksin, family and associates were identified by name and criminal offense in court documents. The lèse majesté charge, in fact, was somewhat confused by 2008 accusations by Thai courts that Sondhi Limthongkul, media barron and former associate-turned foe of Thaksin had induced Thai people to believe that there were pro and con-monarchy groups in Thailand. Some believe the accusation was an attempt to reduce the negative image of Thaksin among royalists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.18.242.168 (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

The political crisis that erupted in 2005 has not ended. Its ongoing, there is no 2 distinct crises, one in 2005-06 and one 2008-10. Any Thai will reject that notion. 96.248.224.167 (talk) 07:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there is too much info for one page, then a template should be made for the "ongoing" crisis.96.248.224.167 (talk) 07:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's one crisis. Charles Essie (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a rather old discussion. I think this article is fine with its current scope; a separate overview article should be created instead. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand#Post-Thaksin politics articles. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on 2005–06 Thai political crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2005–2006_Thai_political_crisis&oldid=1216895471"