Talk:2005–2006 Fijian political crisis

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Fiji High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move protection

Move protected for 1 week. 6 moves in the last 2 days, yet this is the first non-template edit to the talk page. Just saying. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 23:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the protection is unnecessary. I moved the main page to what I thought was a better name; my reasoning was that the ndash is not accessible on most keyboards. So I replaced it with a hyphen, not knowing that the manual of style (updated considerably in my 8-year absence from Wikipedia) requires the ndash. DrKiernan moved it back. I didn't know what was going on, so I reverted him. Then I read his rationale and understood. THE MISTAKE WAS MINE, not his. I have also corrected all of the redirects, so that all articles that I'm aware of link to this article directly now. There was no edit conflict, just a misunderstanding, and that's solved now. So I'm removing the protection - my page naming was in error and I recognize DrKiernan's naming as correct as per MOS. David Cannon (talk) 09:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]