Talk:2004 in paleontology
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The legends for all the dinosaur images on this page say "Albertaceratops" which is obviously wrong for all of them. Can someone sort this out and fix it? - tameeria (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://homepage.mac.com/paulselden/Home/files/Madagascar.pdf}}
- In 2004 in paleontology on 2011-05-25 07:51:14, 404 Not Found
- In 2004 in paleontology on 2011-06-11 12:42:35, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Otogosaurus
[edit]Is Otogosaurus really a valid taxon? I cannot find a single scientific resource on it (not even the description paper). Ashorocetus (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Most probably a nomen nudum. Zhao 2004 was never published (I think) Burmeister (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think so too. That's what it says on the List of dinosaur genera page. I just fixed it here.Ashorocetus (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- List-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- List-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- List-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles