Talk:2004 Oregon Ballot Measure 36

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Oregon: Government Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oregon Government & Politics Workgroup.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Map caption

I don't think it is entirely clear which shade of green is intended to be considered "bold." Distinguishing between light and dark green, I think would avoid any confusion. Or maybe my astygmatism is just kicking in. -- "J-M" (Jgilhousen) 04:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain that the dark green counties are the ones that voted for the measure by a 2/3 margin and are thus labeled "bold green." I concur with your assessment, though; I only knew which shade was considered to be "bold" because of a general familiarity with Oregon political demographics. The phrases "light green" and "dark green" would be more understandable. —NathanDahlin 21:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I went ahead and changed the caption to "bright green" and "dark green" per this discussion. —NathanDahlin 03:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Efforts to repeal

Does anyone remember the movement to revoke this measure, which was put on hold when Justice McShane made his decision? Is this part of the constitution dead wood only as long as McShane's -- as well as today's Supreme Court decision -- is observed? -- llywrch (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oregon Ballot Measure 36 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theoutlookonline.com/article/2410

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]