Jump to content

Talk:2004 Les Saintes earthquake/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 16:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me after reading the sources either.

Files

[edit]

File:USGS Shakemap – 2004 Les Saintes earthquake.jpg: good, relevant, valid public domain rationale.

Prose

[edit]
  • "the eastern boundary is that of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone" – first mention in the body, wikilink Lesser Antilles subduction zone
  • "A maximum intensity of VIII (Heavily damaging)" – maybe reiterate that this was recorded via the European macroseismic scale?
  • "and a college were red-tagged" – red-tagged?
  • "that occurred about 7 km (4.3 mi) to the northwest of the" – "to the" is unnecessary.
  • "and wall and roof damage (including at some locations that were damaged during the mainshock)." – this is personal taste but I find it visually unappealing when a sentence ends with parentheses like this; there are two punctuation marks plus the citation. Suggest "and wall and roof damage—including at some locations that were damaged during the mainshock."
  • "scientists were on scene within several days to investigate." – reads a bit like an upbeat news article; maybe "scientists were on scene several days later to investigate."?
  • There are a few instances of "sea dropped" – should "sea" be "sea level" here?
  • Add WP:ALT text to the image.
  • Recommend adding Template:Use mdy dates and Template:Use X English under the short description.

See also

[edit]
  • I do not think Overseas France is necessary; wikilinking overseas department in the lead should be enough.

Refs

[edit]
  • Refs 3 and 7 look to be dead links.

Spot check on refs 5 and 8 show no concerns—they both support their cited content. I have access to ref 5 via the Wikipedia Library.

[edit]

Good.

Other

[edit]

Navs and cats all good.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.