Jump to content

Talk:2004 FA Community Shield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2004 FA Community Shield has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2004 FA Community Shield is part of the 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2014Good article nomineeListed
April 9, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
April 1, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2004 FA Community Shield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Aah well, in for a penny, in for a pound, will do take a look at this as well....queries below. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'd link stoppage time.
I'd write, "For Arsenal,..." at the beginning of the Team selection section - to delineate better.
ref 16 does not mention the £175,000 figure and reference to it bing the the largest ever given to a club by the FA in it. It is a good fact and would be good to keep in as long as we can find a source.
Many thanks for taking the time to review. Have made adjustments. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources: - spotchecking was in order apart from one identified above.
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - Good conversion of guardian match-speak to encyclopedic English. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]