Jump to content

Talk:2004 California Proposition 71

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quotes

[edit]

There seem to be a lot of phrases in "quotes" throughout the article, but it is unclear who or what is being quoted. The quotes either need removed or properly attributed. Peyna 00:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

[edit]

I think the impact of paying back 3 billion dollars plus interest in bonds is worth mentioning for such an indebted state. Also, I think it should be mentioned somewhere that the state has yet to benefit in anyway from this expenditure. - Schrandit 16:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on California Proposition 71 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on California Proposition 71 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could we move some of this content to CIRM page?

[edit]

Hello, some of this content seems to me to be more appropriate for the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine page than here - specifically, the sections on The new institute and Background would really add clarity to the page about the agency; instead, they are buried here in the details of a state ballot proposition. I Would it be ok if I (or someone else) moved them? SENsters (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]