Talk:2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Right, I will take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I'd tack the lone sentence at the bottom of the lead onto the end of the first para. Isolated sentences look choppy.
- ..
.reinforced Chelsea's position in first - sounds like a gear...I'd go with "reinforced Chelsea's position at the top of the table"
Backgroundsection has no inline cites
I've put some [citation needed] tags further down too.
Otherwise looks ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking a look at this. Have made corrections. Lemonade51 (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, Earwig's copyvio checker passed ok.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - all good Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)