Jump to content

Talk:2003 CONCACAF Gold Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Original research in ranking?

[edit]

As far as I can see, there is only an official ranking for the first four teams. The article also gives a ranking for teams 5-12, apparantly based on points. I can not find information on the official concacaf-site, but on every other page that I find, there is no such ranking, so it looks like original research. Also, the column with the percentage is very strange. I know what it means, the calculation seems correct and verifiable, but I've never seen such a percentage in football results anywhere. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on 2003 CONCACAF Gold Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]