Jump to content

Talk:2002 PDC World Darts Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Data sources for 2002 PDC World Darts Championship http://www.dartsportseite.de/

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 PDC World Darts Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sportsfan77777 (talk · contribs) 05:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • ninth staging of the competition since ===>>> ninth staging of the competition beginning with
  • it occurred at the Circus Tavern ===>>> it took place at the Circus Tavern
  • fellow player Peter Manley ===>>> second-time finalist Peter Manley
  • It was both players' second appearance against each other in the final of the PDC world championship since the 1999 competition. ===>>> It was a rematch of the 1999 PDC World Championship final, which Taylor also won.
  • the 2001 tournament runner-up John Part ===>>> the 2001 tournament runner-up John Part,

Background

[edit]
  • Matt Chapman was the player who advanced from qualifying to the main draw (add ", making his debut at the tournament")
  • it had a total prize fund ===>>> the tournament had a total prize fund
  • seven in the first round to eleven to the second round and the semi-finals ===>>> seven in the first round to eleven from the second round to the semi-finals

Round 1

[edit]
  • General question: Are the individual "targets" on the board actually called rings? I thought the ring was the whole double ring or the whole treble ring. (e.g. Should it be "double 18 ring" or just "double 18"?)
  • General comment: I would suggest labelling all of the seeds as "world number __" and leaving the rankings out for all of the remaining unseeded players. As of now, I don't see a pattern with who is labelled with a ranking and who is not.
  • the director of the world championship Tommy Cox ===>>> the director of the world championship Tommy Cox,
  • in which 32 players ===>>> in which all 32 players
  • en route to completing a 100 checkout. ===>>> , completing the fourth set with a 100 checkout.
  • Lim won three legs ===>>> Lim won only three legs
  • one set behind Les Fitton ===>>> one set behind against Les Fitton
  • Part then won six legs in a row to win (add "the match")

Round 2

[edit]
  • Warriner,[29] who was the highest ranked player to lose in the tournament. ===>>> Warriner,[29] who was the first player ranked in the top ten to lose in the tournament. (Of course he was the highest-ranked player to lose if he is number one and he lost.)
  • with both players tying the score four times in the first eight sets ===>>> after neither player led by more than a se t until the end of the match. (I don't think "both players tying the score four times" is clear.)
  • Baxter took more than one hour ===>>> Baxter only took a little more than one hour (It's supposed to be a short amount of time, right?)
  • Baxter's higher finishing average won him six consecutive sets ===>>> Baxter's higher finishing average won him six consecutive legs in the middle of the match (legs, not sets)
  • Taylor averaged 111.21 points of a three-dart average ===>>> Taylor averaged 111.21 points OR Taylor had a three-dart average of 111.21 points
  • After both players began at a slow pace with Harrington compiling high scores (add "and missing checkouts") and Priestley making checkouts (add "without high scores")
  • after Harrington failed to complete a 169 checkout. <<<=== I'd leave this out. It doesn't seem important. (Also, there is no such thing as a 169 checkout...)

Quarterfinals

[edit]

Semifinals

[edit]
  • after it went to a fifth leg ===>> after the final set went to a fifth leg
  • Taylor then took sets five and six for a 6–1 win when one of his darts landed inside the outer double 20 ring. ===>>> Taylor then took sets five and six for a 6–0 win, only losing one leg in each of the final two sets. (The finishing dart isn't important if it's not close or a big checkout.)

Final

[edit]
  • This was Taylor's eleventh world final ===>>> This was Taylor's eleventh world championship final
  • and was runner-up ===>>> , having finished runner-up
  • Manley win its first leg ===>>> Manley win his first leg
  • Taylor took four sets in a row to win the fifth set ===>>> Taylor took four legs in a row to win the fifth set
  • Manley was unable ===>>> In the first leg of the final set, Manley was unable

Prize fund

[edit]
  • Okay.

Draw

[edit]
  • Okay.

Overall

[edit]
  • Well-sourced, and the links work.
  • No dab links.
  • No plagiarism concerns.

The first half looks better now. Placing on hold for the rest. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 10:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk05:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: The copyvio matches are just quotes. epicgenius (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]