Talk:2001 Hungarian Grand Prix

2001 Hungarian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 7, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2001 Hungarian Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Formula One Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 Hungarian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 09:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
It contains copyright infringements -
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links

Prose

Lede

Could the lede mention that there was qualifying? Just says he started at the front. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
" and he equalled the all-time record of career victories" only because it comments on winning the title before this, either need to move it to above this, or make it clear you are saying career race victories, and not championships Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
t was headline news in Germany and Italy - well, it was worldwide news, surely? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure BAR needs to be shortened as you only use it once in the lede. It should be condensed in the prose instead. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General

For an article of this size, can we get some more images? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Before the race Ferrari driver Michael Schumacher led the Drivers' Championship with 84 points, ahead of David Coulthard of McLaren (47 points) and Williams' Ralf Schumacher (41) - might be personal preference, but I'm not sure these need to be in brackets. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Schumacher, Juan Manuel Fangio, Arrows, Tarso Marques, Central European Summer Time, (UTC+2) are duplinks. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}
- Hi MWright96 - The article is pretty much everything you could want out of a GA. I've had a couple read throughs, but this was all I could come up with. I'm quite happy to pass this one. The above is just some comments worth making when you get some time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.