Talk:2001 Gujarat cyclone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am reviewing this article. The prose is good and flows nicely.

• The problem is three dead reference links.[1]

Otherwise, the article is fine.

Xtzou (Talk) 17:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• • Sorted - Reliefweb had moved them to another part of their site.Jason Rees (talk) 12:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

• Issues addressed. Article passes. Xtzou (Talk) 13:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Well written

   B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: Reliable sources

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: Sets the context

   B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Great illustrations!

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Nice job. Xtzou (Talk) 13:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)