Talk:2000 United States presidential election in North Carolina

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: North Carolina / Presidential elections / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

"This is better formatting" — actually very ugly and “squashed”?

When it is said by user 2603:6010:F006:964B:E887:EDBB:3773:922A of the last edit

“

This is better formatting

”

in my mind, as I may have noted in previous talk pages (1976 in South Carolina), it is exceedingly ugly formatting. Moreover, even in mobile view, removing the collapsible table and nowrap formatting does not solve the problem of fitting the table onto a small mobile phone. One still has to slide the table to read it in full without the nowrap formatting, and the benefits of having something more similar to the desktop view — and as previously said in my view a much more attractive look without every column almost completely “squashed” word-by-word. Luokehao (talk) 01:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]