Talk:2000 Hungarian Grand Prix

2000 Hungarian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 6, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2000 Hungarian Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Hungarian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Dawnseeker2000 and I'll be reviewing this article. There will be some time to get a start on it today, but as I'm a fairly inexperienced reviewer, this may take some time. The good news is that the article looks great; very well organized and nice to look at. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article has a great presentation. It's neat with nice full paragraphs and has good continuity.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I made several small improvements to the text, but overall, the word usage in the article has been done well.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I swapped one reference (for the Minardi drivers qualifying last) but all other spot checks were fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I find that for an average F1 race with not too much off the beaten path, this article is complete in its description of the events.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Again, the article reads well. Just the facts; and there are a lot of them. Good job.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images of Hakkinen and Shumacher have CC licenses.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'm passing this article. I still prefer to watch the races, but this is a good read.

Good work on this article. I'm promoting it. Dawnseeker2000 03:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]