Talk:2000 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 16:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The number style is consistent on this article.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The number of primary sources with this one is more than a quarter of the references, but not too many to cause concern.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit wars
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
I have a concern with the picture of David Coulthard. Specifically, the water mark on the picture screams copyright infringement. Unless that was uploaded by a Wiki user who just happens to own Harcourt, I would suggest using a different photo of Coulthard.
The objectionable picture has been replaced. Z105space (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the change.--Nascar king 17:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass:
The only thing preventing this from passing was the watermark on the David Coulthard picture. Now that it has been changed, I hereby give 2000 Austrian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 16:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nascarking: The sole problem has been rectified. 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Z105space (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]