Talk:2/6th Commando Squadron (Australia)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2/6th Commando Squadron (Australia) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2/6th Commando Squadron (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: South Pacific / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War II task force

Move

I would like to move 2/6th Independent Company (Australia) to 2/6th Commando Squadron (Australia), as this was the last name assigned to the unit. Any comments? --Newm30 (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newm30, I agree with your reasoning, but think that as the other similar units (Australian independent companies/commando squadrons) are listed on Wiki as 'independent companies' then 2/6th should remain so also. It is certainly problematic the number of names these units were known by, making it difficult to know what to call them. I have included a bit in the intro about the various names. There are a number of arguments for and against, I feel. On the for side: the unit was last known as 2/6th Commando Squadron. On the against: I believe that most members of the unit themselves refer to it as 2/6th Independent Company (I've nothing to back this up, though, apart from having spoken to a few when I went through 12 Platoon, ARTC). I would be interested in getting other people's opinion about this matter, but think at at the moment it should not be changed as it would require changing all the other independent companies as well.AustralianRupert (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am currently in the process of changing the other similar units (Australian independent companies/commando squadrons). Will change as I move up the list. Regards --Newm30 (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Cheers.AustralianRupert (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle Honours

I have not included battle honours in the article as I am unsure whether the unit received any. I suspect that they did not, as they are not listed in the unit's history, or on the AWM site. This may be due to the 'cavalry' designation as only infantry units received battle honours. Arguably, though, the unit was clearly an infantry unit as they were always 'footsloggers' and never went into battle on vehicles (or horses for that matter! ;-)). Anyway, if anyone knows different - please feel free to add battle honours to the page. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B-class assessment

I've just assessed this article as B-class as it does a good job of covering the topic, is well written and contains appropriate supporting graphics and references. The last section of the article needs to be referenced or removed, however. Nick-D (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]