Talk:1st Helicopter Squadron

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.afa.org/magazine/jan2001/0101heli.pdf
- In 1st Helicopter Squadron on 2011-05-25 06:53:04, 404 Not Found
- In 1st Helicopter Squadron on 2011-06-10 03:50:44, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns section

IPs and a named account keep adding a section on Community Environmental and Safety Concerns. The concerns are noise complaints sourced to a yahoo groups post. There are no reliable sources that I have found. The other concern that is raised is the flight level saying the helicopters are flying over schools and what would happen if there were mechanical problems when flying over the schools. This is not sourced at all, it just appears to be the concerns of the person who originally posted the section, CapitolHillNeighbors. As far as I can tell, there isn't even any proof that the helicopters the original poster is talking about, just speculation on the second posters part. It does not belong in the article as sourced as the Yahoo groups post is not a reliable source. Would it belong in the article if there was a reliable source? I don't know, it depends on what the source says. -- GB fan 21:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've reverted this once prior. Seems a lot like someone who wants to use a WP article to air dirty laundry over a neighborhood complaint. Perfectly appropriate for your local message board. Not appropriate for Wikipedia. TimothyJosephWood 12:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]