Talk:1st Born Second

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st Born Second article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music High‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:1stBornAlbum.jpg, found on 1st Born Second, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 17:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Sun-Times

Complete 4/4 star review by Chicago Sun-Times. Transcribed using Google News Advanced News Archive Search:

On the heels of the mega-success of Philadelphia songstress Jill Scott comes another smooth-as-butter, "neo-soul" release out of the City of Brotherly Love. Bilal's stellar debut "1st Born Second" shows us what love is all about--and it ain't bump and grind. Instead, it's about music. And singing. And the gift of storytelling that has fallen by the wayside in mainstream R&B. Bilal waltzes us on the sad ballad "When Will You Call," and self-reflects on the jazzy "Sometimes,"perfectly reproducing Prince's trademark falsetto wail. In fact, the Prince influence is heard throughout the CD, especially when Bilal screams "you could be a star" (a la "Baby I'ma Star) on the funky "For You." Prince isn't the only "elder" getting respect from Bilal. He's also conjured up the likes of old-school crooners Marvin Gaye and Curtis Mayfield in "Fast Lane" and added a dab of hip- hop ("Reminisce," featuring Common and Mos Def, offers a stark contrast to the silky smooth "Soul Sista," produced by neo soul pioneer Raphael Saadiq. Fellow Philadelphia natives The Roots and Dr. Dre also show up on the album. While the intoxicating mixture of sounds will tickle the senses, it's Bilal's voice that keeps the ear yearning for more. Bilal (which he says stands for Beautiful Intelligent Lustful And Livin' it) uses his vocals to groan low like a bass drum and soar in high falsetto range. Like his obvious mentors, Prince and D'Angelo, this adventurous new artist is poised to carve out his own niche in the music world and stay there awhile.

Dan56 (talk) 14:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5931751/n_sync_cake_lead_new_cds
- In 1st Born Second on 2011-05-25 06:51:45, 404 Not Found
- In 1st Born Second on 2011-06-10 03:32:04, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.blender.com/guide/new/50824/1st-born-second.html
- In 1st Born Second on 2011-05-25 06:51:46, 404 Not Found
- In 1st Born Second on 2011-06-10 03:33:04, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1st Born Second. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1604738/a/1st+Born+Second.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017230709/http://www.villagevoice.com/2001-08-07/music/vagina-monologues/ to http://www.villagevoice.com/2001-08-07/music/vagina-monologues/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1604738/a/1st+Born+Second.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]