Talk:1st Armoured Brigade (Australia)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st Armoured Brigade (Australia) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1st Armoured Brigade (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Land vehicles / South Pacific / World War II / Cold War A‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

A

This article has been rated as A-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

1st Armoured Brigade (Australia) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
July 24, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1st Armoured Brigade (Australia)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in good shape. I have a few comments:

link Australian Army Reserve for Citizens Military Force in the lead
- Done. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
suggest linking interwar period for interwar
- Added. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
you could link Greta in the body
- Added. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
you could drop 1942 from " in July 1942"
- Removed. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps state that the Grants were medium tanks and the Stuarts light tanks?
- Added. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1st Army Division's headquarters? Armoured?
- Adjusted. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
consistency re 112th Anti-tank Regiment and 112th Anti-Tank Regiment
- Adjusted. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than "The brigade's parent formation" I would just say "III Corps"
- Clarified that it was the divisional headquarters. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Optional: a couple of questions about hyphenation of compound adjectives, part time→part-time and self contained→self-contained
- Adjusted. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps mention that the Matilda was an infantry tank, and the Centurion was a main battle tank, with links
- Added. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I know it is confusing, but should 6th Royal New South Wales Rifles link to 6th Light Horse Regiment (Australia)? Or is the lineage different?
- Same lineage that I can tell from Festberg. The 6th is already linked, though -- "and a motor regiment, the 6th." -- so I was hoping to avoid a dup link here, but I can add it in if you think it necessary for clarity. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think either a duplink or a sentence fragment explaining this was the same unit (sort of). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ok, I added a short bit about the lineage being retained. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about the ref for the UCP. The link on the commons file takes you to diggerhistory.info, which isn't a RS, and there is no image of the UCP there?
- G'day, the relevant UCP on the Digger History link is plate 508, which seems correct to me (you have to scroll up once you click through). The plates are just scans of Keith Glyde's Distinguishing Colour Patches of the Australian Military Forces 1915-1951, so I'm confident they are accurate enough. I've updated the Commons description page to make this clearer. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah. I reckon that's fine then. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
there are citation tags for Hopkins 1978, but nothing in the Biblio for Hopkins?
- Added. Not sure what happened here, but I think Nick and I kept adding and removing it by accident. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm pretty sure that I accidentally deleted it while editing on my laptop at the NLA this afternoon. Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
some of the ISBNs are hyphenated, some not
- Adjusted. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Nice work, I had no idea we had three armoured divisions in WWII... Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Peacemaker67: G'day, PM, I think I've gotten all these now. Thanks for taking a look at this. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an appropriately licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks a lot from me as well Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]