Talk:1Day Sooner
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Submission decline and sigcov
[edit]Hi @User:Tom (LT), thanks for taking the time to review the submission. Highlighted in the table below are a few of the sources already in the article, showing it meets GNG requirements. Happy to discuss in more detail as well. (Note that some articles cited in this draft may erroneously write "1 Day Sooner" or "One Day Sooner", so a quick Ctrl+F may miss them.)
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Science, July 2020 | Five mentions by name, including discussion of its members and advocacy. | ✔ Yes | ||
ABC News, October 2020 | Four consecutive paragraphs about 1Day Sooner and its advocacy. | ✔ Yes | ||
Guardian, December 2020 | Four paragraphs describing 1Day Sooner, describing an interaction with the WHO, and quoting a representative. | ✔ Yes | ||
Vox, November 2022 | Several direct mentions of 1Day Sooner, and quotation of two of its representatives, regarding tuberculosis challenge trials. | ✔ Yes | ||
Vox, March 2021 | Extensive discussion of 1Day Sooner's volunteers, advocacy, and arguments made against its position on Covid-19 challenge trials in humans. | ✔ Yes | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 21:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- N.B. — Tom has been away for several weeks, so I opted to resubmit. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 14:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)