Talk:1999 Ontario general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Ontario / Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Untitled

Brampton West—Mississauga
Party		Candidate	Votes	%	Expenditures
	Progressive Conservative	(x)Tony Clement	24,909	55.87	$71,283.13
	Liberal	Vic Dhillon	16,599	37.23	$70,662.58
	New Democratic Party	John Devries	2,824	6.33	$7,000.00
	Natural Law Party	Mei Sze Viau	252	0.57	$0.00
Total valid votes			44,584	100.00
Rejected, unmarked and declined ballots			501
Turnout			45,085	51.23

Untitled

moved this here for the time being Pete Peters 16:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton West
Party		Candidate	Votes	%	±%	Expenditures
	New Democratic Party	(x)David Christopherson	15,625	37.84		$63,891.36
	Progressive Conservative	(x)Lillian Ross	12,261	29.70		$58,588.68
	Liberal	Frank D'Amico	12,037	29.15		$48,994.28
	Green	Phyllis McColl	495	1.20	–	$6,090.89
	Family Coalition	Lynne Scime	403	0.98	–	$1,100.80
	Ind. (Marxist-Leninist)	Wendell Fields	236	0.57		$0.00
	Natural Law	Rita Rassenberg	231	0.56		$0.00
Total valid votes			41,288	100.00
Total rejected, unmarked and declined ballots			549
Turnout			41,837	57.87

dido Pete Peters 14:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Catharines
Party		Candidate	Votes	%	Expenditures
	Liberal	(x)Jim Bradley	25,186	53.90	$45,478.14
	Progressive Conservative	(x)Tom Froese	17,994	38.51	$68,831.44
	New Democratic Party	Gordon Coggins	2,902	6.21	$8,286.11
	Natural Law Party	Helene Ann Darisse	272	0.58	$0.00
	Green	Douglas Woodard	215	0.46	$83.93
	Ind. (Marxist-Leninist)	Ron Walker	154	0.33	$112.00
Total valid votes			46,723	100.00
Rejected, unmarked and declined ballots			336
Turnout			47,059	59.61

Pete Peters 14:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Windsor—St. Clair
Party		Candidate	Votes	%	Expenditures
	Liberal	(x)Dwight Duncan	17,383	45.09	$69,840.80
	New Democratic Party	(x)Wayne Lessard	13,171	34.16	$31,781.20
	Progressive Conservative	Michael Rohrer	7,241	18.78	$35,852.00
	Green	Darren J. Brown	339	0.88	$0.00
	Independent	Ralph Kirchner	263	0.68	$173.20
	Natural Law Party	Janet Shorten	159	0.41	$0.00
Total valid votes			38,556	100.00
Rejected, unmarked and declined ballots			243
Turnout			38,799	52.46

Windsor West
Party		Candidate	Votes	%	Expenditures
	Liberal	(x)Sandra Pupatello	24,388	65.50	$36,524.00
	Progressive Conservative	David McCamon	6,229	16.73	$18,201.57
	New Democratic Party	Liam McCarthy	5,762	15.48	$32,434.80
	Green	Timothy Dugdale	420	1.13	no return filed
	Ind. (Marxist-Leninist)	Robert Cruise	270	0.73	$2,023.00
	Natural Law Party	Lynn Tobin	162	0.44	$0.00
Total valid votes			37,231	100.00
Rejected, unmarked and declined ballots			403
Turnout			37,634	49.27

Pete Peters 15:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pete: I already have copies of these on various candidate pages, so there's no compelling need to keep them here if you're changing the format. CJCurrie 21:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no need for them. I just thought these would be used for the Electoral districs entries. Pete Peters 22:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, please? This page is incredibly misleading without them, and since this is relevant to the upcoming federal election, I propose it be taken down until one source (at the very least, an Ontario-based newspaper) is cited. MLA is preferred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.6.120 (talk) 21:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So... why don't you add some? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]