Jump to content

Talk:1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 24, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 22, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 7, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Confirmed tornadoes

[edit]

Can't seem to come up with the six short lived tornadoes that touched down before the three long-lived tornadoes. Anyone know of any good sources where this information is confirmed? --RyguyMN 03:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to check out the NCDC archived list, they could have the information there. The long-tracked tornadoes that take up a lot of space in the box could also be moved into separate sections below the list. CrazyC83 19:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here is what I found from NCDC:
  • Location or County Date Time Type Mag Dth Inj PrD CrD
  • 1 Lismore 03/29/1998 03:23 PM Tornado F2 0 0 400K 0
  • 2 Leota 03/29/1998 03:25 PM Tornado F0 0 0 10K 0
  • 3 Wilmont 03/29/1998 03:28 PM Tornado F0 0 0 50K 0
  • 4 St Killian 03/29/1998 03:35 PM Tornado F2 0 0 200K 0
  • 5 St Killian 03/29/1998 03:45 PM Tornado F1 0 0 100K 0
  • 6 Avoca 03/29/1998 03:50 PM Tornado F1 0 0 50K 0
  • 7 Fulda 03/29/1998 03:55 PM Tornado F1 0 0 50K 0
  • 8 Westbrook 03/29/1998 03:55 PM Tornado F3 0 3 30.0M 0
  • 9 Darfur 03/29/1998 04:28 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
  • 10 Comfrey 03/29/1998 04:30 PM Tornado F4 1 16 45.0M 0
  • 11 Cambria 03/29/1998 05:05 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
  • 12 Courtland 03/29/1998 05:07 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
  • 13 Wabasha 03/29/1998 05:07 PM Tornado F0 0 0 0 0
  • 14 Nicollet 03/29/1998 05:18 PM Tornado F3 1 0 120.0M 0
  • 15 Ottawa 03/29/1998 05:35 PM Tornado F3 0 0 0 0
  • 16 Cleveland 03/29/1998 05:48 PM Tornado F2 0 2 20.0M 0
  • 17 Lonsdale 03/29/1998 06:09 PM Tornado F1 0 0 0 0
  • 18 Lonsdale 03/29/1998 06:16 PM Tornado F2 0 0 20.0M 0
  • 19 Castle Rock 03/29/1998 06:25 PM Tornado F2 0 0 0 0
  • 20 Hastings 03/29/1998 06:43 PM Tornado F0 0 0 0 0
  • TOTALS: 2 21 235.860M 0
We know that there were 14 tornadoes in this outbreak, and that there was only one F4 and one F3. So #'s 8, 9, 11,12 & 15 look to be duplicate entries for the same tornado. Also, based on the NWS graphic on the page, it appears that #1 & #4 are the same one (since there was only one F2 in that region of the state). So if you get rid of those 6 lines ([1 or 4], 8, 9, 11, 12, 15) I think you have what you're looking for. Besdies the NCDC, here is a link that has some useful info... http://climate.umn.edu/doc/journal/comfrey_tornado_five_year.htm >> Gopher backer 20:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, based on the write-up above, the #1 tornado was in fact the first tornado touchdown. It looks like we should go with #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. I've bolded them also. Does everyone else agree? If so, the tornado listing should be updated to reflect this. RyguyMN 18:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The summary listing of tornadoes has been updated with the bolded tornado events included and have also added the times of touchdowns. RyguyMN 18:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Checking this again

[edit]

1. 1 Lismore 03/29/1998 03:23 PM Tornado F2 0 0 400K 0
2. 2 Leota 03/29/1998 03:25 PM Tornado F0 0 0 10K 0
3. 3 Wilmont 03/29/1998 03:28 PM Tornado F0 0 0 50K 0
4. 4 St Killian 03/29/1998 03:35 PM Tornado F2 0 0 200K 0
5. 5 St Killian 03/29/1998 03:45 PM Tornado F1 0 0 100K 0
6. 7 Fulda 03/29/1998 03:55 PM Tornado F1 0 0 50K 0
7. *6 Avoca 03/29/1998 03:50 PM Tornado F1 0 0 50K 0
8 Westbrook 03/29/1998 03:55 PM Tornado F3 0 3 30.0M 0
9 Darfur 03/29/1998 04:28 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
10 Comfrey 03/29/1998 04:30 PM Tornado F4 1 16 45.0M 0
11 Cambria 03/29/1998 05:05 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
12 Courtland 03/29/1998 05:07 PM Tornado F4 0 0 0 0
8.13 Wabasha 03/29/1998 05:07 PM Tornado F0 0 0 0 0
9.*14 Nicollet 03/29/1998 05:18 PM Tornado F3 1 0 120.0M 0
15 Ottawa 03/29/1998 05:35 PM Tornado F3 0 0 0 0
10 16 Cleveland 03/29/1998 05:48 PM Tornado F2 0 2 20.0M 0
11. 17 Lonsdale 03/29/1998 06:09 PM Tornado F1 0 0 0 0
12. 18 Lonsdale 03/29/1998 06:16 PM Tornado F2 0 0 20.0M 0
13. 19 Castle Rock 03/29/1998 06:25 PM Tornado F2 0 0 0 0
14. 20 Hastings 03/29/1998 06:43 PM Tornado F0 0 0 0 0

After further research, I think that this list is correct, and not the one we'd come up with before. I'll go ahead and make the changes, and I'm also going to include 2 Wisconsin tornadoes in here as well. Gopher backer (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fatalities

[edit]

There is mention that there was one fatality in St. Peter. Are these articles supposed to name the victims? Gopher backer 22:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming victims is not necessary for these articles RyguyMN 05:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Peter, Minnesota says that the tornado that hit St. Peter killed one person. Gustavus Adolphus College says it killed two, and one of them was near the college. 1998 Comfrey - St. Peter tornado outbreak says two people were killed by two tornadoes: one in Hanska (but he didn't die until the next day) and one in St. Peter (but it mentions him twice). All of these are true, but confusing, especially when taken together. I'd like to change the Gustavus count to 1, and revise this article for clarity. Eostrom 02:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I updated this article (and moved the ref), feel free to adjust the Gustavus one as well. Gopher backer 03:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nice article. One question about the twenty people who reached safety in a church in Comfrey. Did the people escape injury when the church was destroyed? —SusanLesch (talk) 18:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not exactly sure about just injuries, but they did escape significant injury. I've updated the wording to better reflect this. thanks, WxGopher (talk) 05:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image sources

[edit]

NOAA acknowledges persons other than NOAA employees for providing the images of destroyed houses, cars, etc. I do not believe that they are, in fact, products of NOAA. I don't know what their copyright situation is, but it is preventing me from giving this article a proper GA review. What are your thoughts? Plasticup T/C 18:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All of the images should be okay.... There is a disclaimer on the NOAA sites that says anything on their page is considered in the public domain, unless stated otherwise. This is also explained a little more on this page. I've also run this by a couple admins in the past, I can try to dig those discussions up if you'd like as well. WxGopher (talk) 19:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's good to know. You'll need to update the licenses (because the current one states taken or made during the course of an employee's official duties), but if they are in the public domain you shouldn't have any trouble. Plasticup T/C 19:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1998 Comfrey – St. Peter tornado outbreak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    WP:MOSNUM requires hard (non-breaking) spaces between numbers and their units. e.g. 150 km/h (click "edit" to see the symbol that makes a hard space). GA reviews don't mind this, but FAC ones certainly do.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    We talked about the image licenses and I am confident that they will be sorted out
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Plasticup T/C 19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado Length Statistics

[edit]

The section on Historical Perspective seems to have a confusing mention of how this tornado was the longest continuously-on-the-ground tornado in Minnesota history, but suggests that other tornadoes had longer paths but were not on the ground continuously. By definition, a tornado must be in contact with the ground, so this needs some clarification to be consistent with the pages on other tornadoes and on tornadoes in general.

I have sent an email to the Twin Cities NWS in attempt to clarify their information used as a major source to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slincoln (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1998_Comfrey–St._Peter_tornado_outbreak&oldid=1196318693"