Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Might be worth linking wickets here for the uninitiated.
Links for the Indian and English teams in the second paragraph?
- Linked both. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background

You use both eleven and 12 in successive sections here.
- Changed both to words. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth mentioning that England were the reigning holders?
- Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

Would the Ireland match have been counted in the final table standings? If so, would be worth explaining how they awarded points for it.
- Have added a little, let me know if you think more is needed (in which case, I would need to explain the whole scoring system.) Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth linking wickets and One Day International again here.
- Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Australia scored 123 for seven led scores of 33 and 31", led by?
- Oops, added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand

"uneven number of teams, only featured four other teams", a little repetitive with the double use of teams perhaps.
- Changed the second to "sides". Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth linking umpires perhaps?
- Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

In the lead, you have no link for Calcutta but include one here. I'd either have both linked or neither.
- Removed. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Emily Drumm is linked here but there is a Drumm mentioned in their route to the final section. I'm assuming it's the same one so the link needs moving up.
- Sorted. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Along similar lines, you drop the first name for Fitzpatrick, but include the first name for Hockley (and Drumm if the above point is agreed) in the same sentence.
- Tidied. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note b is a little oddly placed as it seems to be describing the scoring method, but at this point it's halfway through the article and there are frequent uses of it prior.
- Moved to the first use. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Ref 13 could do with an accessdate.
- Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, I could probably pass this now and have no complaints as it's a very well-written piece. A couple of minor suggestions and adjustments above that could be looked at though, so placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Many thanks for the review. I have responded to each point above. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with all of the responses to the queries above, nice work. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]