Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final

1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 14, 2020. (Reviewed version).

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket: Women's cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Women's cricket task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Women's sport: Cricket Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's cricket task force.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Might be worth linking wickets here for the uninitiated.
Links for the Indian and English teams in the second paragraph?
- Linked both. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background

You use both eleven and 12 in successive sections here.
- Changed both to words. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth mentioning that England were the reigning holders?
- Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

Would the Ireland match have been counted in the final table standings? If so, would be worth explaining how they awarded points for it.
- Have added a little, let me know if you think more is needed (in which case, I would need to explain the whole scoring system.) Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth linking wickets and One Day International again here.
- Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Australia scored 123 for seven led scores of 33 and 31", led by?
- Oops, added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand

"uneven number of teams, only featured four other teams", a little repetitive with the double use of teams perhaps.
- Changed the second to "sides". Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth linking umpires perhaps?
- Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

In the lead, you have no link for Calcutta but include one here. I'd either have both linked or neither.
- Removed. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Emily Drumm is linked here but there is a Drumm mentioned in their route to the final section. I'm assuming it's the same one so the link needs moving up.
- Sorted. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Along similar lines, you drop the first name for Fitzpatrick, but include the first name for Hockley (and Drumm if the above point is agreed) in the same sentence.
- Tidied. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note b is a little oddly placed as it seems to be describing the scoring method, but at this point it's halfway through the article and there are frequent uses of it prior.
- Moved to the first use. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Ref 13 could do with an accessdate.
- Added. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, I could probably pass this now and have no complaints as it's a very well-written piece. A couple of minor suggestions and adjustments above that could be looked at though, so placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Many thanks for the review. I have responded to each point above. Harrias ^talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with all of the responses to the queries above, nice work. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]