Talk:1996 United Nations Secretary-General selection

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Opinion Presented as Fact

This article contains statements about US positions that are not supported by reliable sources, such as that the United States was using the UN as a scapegoat. (This is probably true, but must be sourced.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: All statements in the article are already supported by inline citations. I have revised that particular sentence to say that Boutros-Ghali (not the UN) was scapegoated. The Washington Post is a reliable source. Please read the inline citations and remove the pov tag. Tozar80 (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]