Talk:1996 Australian Grand Prix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1996 Australian Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sports / Motorsport Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1996 Australian Grand Prix is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian motorsport (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1996 Australian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050302223843/http://www.fia.com:80/resources/documents/238247948__14_03_1996_F1_Lights_Pits.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/238247948__14_03_1996_F1_Lights_Pits.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1996 Australian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/rr582.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505073534/http://f1rejects.com/teams/forti/index.html to http://f1rejects.com/teams/forti/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Report fails to point out a fact

In the main article, under the subject of Race...

It mentions Martin Brundle was behind them and unable to slow sufficiently, hitting the rear of Herbert's and Coulthard's cars and was launched into a barrel roll, ending in a sand trap at turn 3 and breaking his car in two. Brundle was unhurt. The race was halted to allow the circuit to be cleared.[8][4]

The race was restarted. Brundle spun off after light contact with Pedro Diniz. ''

Point of note: If Brundle crashed and his car broken in half, then as soon as race was restarted, how is he supposed to be racing? If he got into a spare car, the details fails to mention this. The report needs to be clear that Brundle got himself a spare car, and need to outline if he was allowed to do so.

2A00:23C4:4881:D201:198C:DF94:392C:8758 (talk) 23:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert's race result

Sources disagree regarding Herbert's race result:

formula1.com (archived) lists his result as "DNS"
formula1.com (current) omits him altogether (which suggests "DNS")
FORIX (subscription site) lists his result as "Not started"
chicanef1.com lists his result as "ret (not started)"
grandprix.com lists his result as "r" (their abbreviation for "retired"), and
StatsF1 lists his result as "ab" (their abbreviation for "retired").

We currently show his result in all the relevant articles as "Ret". Given that formula1.com, FORIX and ChicaneF1 all give it as (some variation of) "did not start", I'm inclined to think we should too. Thoughts? DH85868993 (talk) 09:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe DNS is more appropriate. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 10:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Official FIA statistics also list him as DNS. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 10:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small 3rd ed. (2000) states: 'dns/ret'. Overall I believe DNS may be more appropriate as a re-started race. Eagleash (talk) 11:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I think there's a pretty clear consensus for "DNS". I've updated the relevant articles. Thank you both for your input. DH85868993 (talk) 01:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]